Rutgers Interactive Track at TREC-5

Rutgers Interactive Track at TREC 2002

Rutgers' TREC-6 Interactive Track Experience

The goal of the Rutgers TREC-6 Interactive Track study was to compare the performance and usability of a system offering positive relevance feedback with one offering positive and negative relevance feedback. Our hypothesis was that the latter system would better support the aspect identification task than the former. Although aspectual recall was higher for the system supporting both kinds of ...

Support for Question-Answering in Interactive Information Retrieval: Rutgers' TREC-9 Interactive Track Experience

We compared two different interfaces to the InQuery IR system with respect to their support for the TREC-9 Interactive Track Question-Answering task. One interface presented search results as a ranked list of document titles (displayed ten at one time), with the text of one document (the first, or any selected one) displayed in a scrollable window. The other presented search results as a ranked...

Rutgers' TREC-7 Interactive Track Experience

We present results of a study comparing two different interactive information retrieval systems: one which supports positive relevance feedback as a termsuggestion device; the other which supports both positive and negative relevance feedback in this same context. The purpose of the study was to investigate the effectiveness and usability of a specific implementation of negative relevance feedb...

Rutgers at the TREC 2012 Session Track

At Rutgers, we approached the Session Track task as an issue of personalization, based on both the behaviors exhibited by the searcher during the course of an information seeking episode, and a classification of the task that led the person to engage in information-seeking behavior. Our general approach is described in detail at the Web site of our project (http://comminfo.rutgers.edu/imls/pood...